DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS OF THE TREASURES OF ISLAMIC SCHOOLS OF THOUGHT

Authors

  • Arditya Prayogi Universitas Islam Negeri KH Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan
  • Riki Nasrullah Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61941/iklila.v7i1.254

Keywords:

Islamic Studies; Kalam; Philosophy; Jurisprudence; Sufism

Abstract

Currently, among Muslims there are various styles of schools of Islamic thought. The emergence of these various schools is a logical consequence of the process of understanding the main texts in the sources of Islamic law, namely the Al-Qur'an and As-Sunah (hadith) where there are rigid understandings of texts that do not provide room for discussion in them, as well as texts that loose text in the form of conjecture, which is possible to be interpreted in various ways. Thus, this article aims to provide a description of various schools of Islamic thought which are divided into four major schools. This article was written with a qualitative descriptive approach using the literature study method. From the results of the discussion, it is known that there are four major poles in Islamic thought, including Kalam, Philosophy, Fiqh and Sufism. These four major schools then have their own principles, methodologies and sources of interpretation, even though they all have the same basic foundation, namely the Al-Qur'an and As-Sunnah.

References

Dewi, Rusmala. “UNIVERSALISME ISLAM DAN KOSMOPOLITISME PERADABAN.” Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari’ah Dan Masyarakat 13, no. 1 (2013): 47–67. doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v13i1.116.

Djakfar, Muhammad. Teologi Ekonomi Membumikan Titah Langit Di Ranah Bisnis. Malang: UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, 2010.

Haroen, Nasrun. Ushul Fiqh. Jakarta: Logos, 1995.

Hasan, M. Ali. Studi Islam. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada, 2000.

Labib, Muhsin. Para Filosof: Sebelum Dan Sesudah Mulla Shadra. Jakarta: Al-Huda, 2005.

Mas’udi, Mas’udi. “Menyingkap Hubungan AgaMa Dan FilsaFat: Merenda Kesesatan Filsafat al-Ghazali, Merespons Keterhubungan Filsafat Dan Agama Ibnu Rusyd.” Jurnal Penelitian 7, no. 2 (August 2013): 301–22. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/jupe.v7i2.816.

Miswar, Miswar. “MAQAMAT (TAHAPAN YANG HARUS DITEMPUH DALAM PROSES BERTASAWUF).” Jurnal ANSIRU PAI 1, no. 2 (December 2017): 8–19. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.30821/ansiru.v1i2.1219.g992.

Nata, Abuddin. Metodologi Studi Islam. Jakarta: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada, 2004.

Prayogi, Arditya. "Masuk Dan Berkembangnya Gerakan Tarbiyah, Studi Kasus: Gerakan Dakwah Kampus Di Institut Teknologi Bandung (Itb) 1983-1998." SINDANG: Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah dan Kajian Sejarah 1.1 (2019): 45-57.

Prayogi, Arditya. "Social Change in Conflict Theory: A Descriptive Study." ARRUS Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 3.1 (2023): 37-42.

Prayogi, Arditya, and Dimas Prasetya. "Humans as Cultured, Ethical, and Aesthetic Beings: A Conceptual Study." Alif Lam: Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities 3.2 (2023): 14-22.

Shidiq, Sapiudin. Ushul Fikih. Jakarta: Kencana, 2011.

Soebani, Beni Ahmad. Filsafat Ilmu. Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 2009.

Soelaiman, Darwis A. FILSAFAT ILMU PENGETAHUAN: Perspektif Barat Dan Islam. Banda Aceh: Bandar Publishing, 2019.

Ulya, Ulya. “TASAWUF DAN TAREKAT: Komparasi Dan Relasi.” ESOTERIK: Jurnal Akhlak Dan Tasawuf 1, no. 1 (2015): 147–65.

Umar, Muin, Asymuni A. Rahman, Zakiah Daradjat, and M. Ali Hasan. Ushul Fikih I. Jakarta: Departemen Agama Republik Indonesia, 1985.

Wijaya, Aksin. “Hermeneutika Al-Qur’an: Memburu Pesan Manusiawi Dalam al-Qur’an.” Ulumuna: Jurnal Studi Keislaman XV, no. 2 (2011): 205–28.

Yasid, Abu. Islam Akomodatif Rekonstruksi Pemahan Islam Sebagai Agama Universal. Yogyakarta: LKiS, 2004.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-03

Issue

Section

Articles