DINAMIKA PENDEKATAN INTERDISIPLINER: Hambatan dan Proyeksi dalam Penelitian Studi Islam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61941/iklila.v6i2.177Keywords:
interdisciplinary approach, Islamic studies, cognitive barriers, intellectualism barriers, , projection of interdisciplinary Islamic studiesAbstract
Interdisciplinary research is becoming a major focus in academic science and policy. Islamic Studies has adopted this approach, especially in addressing social issues such as gender, environment, and pluralism. Although controversial, interdisciplinary research in Islamic studies is considered essential for understanding the complexity of life and solving the problems of this age. This research is a literature study that describes the dynamics of the interdisciplinary approach in Islamic studies, including its obstacles and projections. Descriptive analysis is used to get the right and appropriate results to answer the existing problem formulations. Data collection is carried out systematically and structured by using literature and data relevant to the topic of the interdisciplinary approach in Islamic studies with the dialog of the concept of challenges and prospects. In Islamic studies, the interdisciplinary approach has received attention due to the complexity of religious phenomena. However, cognitive barriers arise from epistemological differences and difficulties integrating concepts, while intellectualism barriers are related to methodological conflicts, personal disagreements, and language factors. Awareness and collaborative efforts are needed to overcome these barriers in developing interdisciplinary research in Islamic studies. Interdisciplinary approach in Islamic studies is increasingly relevant in the face of the complexity of contemporary issues. It is important to maintain consistency with Islamic principles and understand the religion from various perspectives. Although there are pros and cons to this approach, interdisciplinary research can overcome cognitive barriers and intellectualism. Awareness and support for interdisciplinary cooperation is key to advancing this research.
References
Abdullah, M. Amin. Islamic Studies Di Perguruan Tinggi: Pendekatan Integratif-Interkonektif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2006.
———. Mencari Islam: Studi Islam Dengan Berbagai Pendekatan. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana, 2000.
———. Multidisiplin, Interdisiplin, & Transdisiplin : Metode Studi Agama Dan Studi Islam Di Era Kontemporer. Yogyakarta: Litera Cahaya Bangsa, 2020.
———. Studi Agama Normativitas Atau Historisitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 1996.
Al-Attas, Syed Muhammad Naquib. Islam And Secularism. Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC, 1993.
Amin, Qomarudin. Quo Vadis Islamic Studies In Indonesia. Jakarta: Departemen Agama, 2006.
Hammam, Muhammad. Tadākhul Al-Ma’ārif Wa Nihāyat Al-Thakhassus Fī Al-Fikr Al-Islāmy Al-‘Araby. Beirut: Markaz Namā` lī al-Buhūts wa al-Dirāsāt, 2017.
Hidayat, Komarudin. “Dialog Studi Interdisipliner Di Tengah Spesialisasi Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman.” Perta VII, no. 2 (2005).
Kaharudin, Rizal Gani, Ita Rodiah, Mohd Shahril Bin Ahmad Razimi, and Moh. Mukri. “Overview of the Philosophy of Science on the Nature of Interdisciplinary Islamic Studies.” Analisis: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 22, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.24042/ajsk.v22i1.10290.
Klein, Julie Thompson. Interdiciplinarity, History, Theory and Practice. Ohio: Wayne State University Press, 1990.
MacLeod, Miles. “What Makes Interdisciplinarity Difficult? Some Consequences of Domain Specificity in Interdisciplinary Practice.” Synthese 195, no. 2 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1236-4.
Melesen, A.G.M. Van. Ilmu Pengetahuan Dan Tanggungjawab Kita. Terj K Bertengs. Jakarta: Gramedia, 1985.
Mujtaba, Saifuddin. “Studi Islam Interdisipliner : Sebuah Keniscayaan.” At-Turāṡ II, no. 2 (2015).
Rahman, Fazlur. Islam and Modernity Transformation of an Intellectual Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.
Rohmatika, Ratu Vina. “Pendekatan Interdisipliner Dan Multidisipliner Dalam Studi Islam.” Al-Adyan: Jurnal Studi Lintas Agama 14, no. 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.24042/ajsla.v14i1.4681.
Ruthven, Malise, and Azim Nanji. Historical Atlas of the Islamic World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
Sibawaihi. “Epistemologizing the Islamic Concept of Resurrection in the Hereafter: A Comparative Study between Al-Ghazālī and Fazlur Rahman.” Afkar 23, no. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.22452/afkar.vol23no2.8.
Smith, Wilfred Cantwell. On Understanding Islam : Selected Studies. Religion and Reason ; 19, 1981.
Thahir, Lukman. Studi Islam Interdisipliner. Yogyakarta: Qirtas, 2003.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Arif Rahmat Triasa -, Mhd. Ilham Armi -, Masnur Al Shaleh, Wahyu Hilmi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.